Sourcing Innovation: Recent Comments2008-07-05T09:36:13Zhttp://blog.sourcinginnovation.com/comments/atom.aspxQuick BlogComment on Sourcing Innovation Welcomes Next Level Purchasing as a Lead Sponsortag:blog.sourcinginnovation.com,2008-07-02:1164203Charles Dominick, SPSMhttp://www.purchasingcourses.com/2008/06/analysts-value-in-purchasing-supply.html2008-07-02T07:37:45Z2008-07-02T07:37:45ZComment on Sourcing Innovation Welcomes Next Level Purchasing as a Lead Sponsortag:blog.sourcinginnovation.com,2008-07-01:1163069Jason Buschhttp://www.spendmatters.com2008-07-01T18:31:32Z2008-07-01T18:31:32Z This is long overdue. You are doing great work. It's about time!]]>Comment on Sourcing Innovation Welcomes Next Level Purchasing as a Lead Sponsortag:blog.sourcinginnovation.com,2008-07-01:1162810Tony P2008-07-01T16:28:28Z2008-07-01T16:28:28ZComment on Sourcing Innovation Welcomes Next Level Purchasing as a Lead Sponsortag:blog.sourcinginnovation.com,2008-07-01:1162401Eric Strovinkhttp://www.busiq.com2008-07-01T14:10:05Z2008-07-01T14:10:05Z I think there is no question that SI has established itself as the premier content provider in this space.]]>Comment on Twittertag:blog.sourcinginnovation.com,2008-07-01:1162046the doctorhttp://blog.sourcinginnovation.com2008-07-01T11:13:07Z2008-07-01T11:13:07Z http://news.cnet.com/8301-13506_3-9981717-17.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-20
It may be difficult to believe such a popular site could be worth nothing in a year, but the way I see it, it's certainly more likely than Twitter being worth $1 billion in that time.
As far as the doctor's concerned, it's worth nothing today! It goes down on a daily basis, restricts "twitters" to 140 bytes or less, and is bursting beyond capacity with self-indulgent twits who think they can be witty 24-hours a day! It's very existence is annoying!]]>Comment on Twittertag:blog.sourcinginnovation.com,2008-06-28:1155738the doctorhttp://blog.sourcinginnovation.com2008-06-28T16:48:40Z2008-06-28T16:48:40Z http://news.cnet.com/8301-13953_3-9979911-80.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-20
I don't think even the Google engineers could build a system that could maintain such ridiculous levels of spewage and not collapse under its own weight!
http://twitter.scripting.com/spewage.html]]>Comment on Twittertag:blog.sourcinginnovation.com,2008-06-28:1155120the doctorhttp://blog.sourcinginnovation.com2008-06-28T09:29:16Z2008-06-28T09:29:16Z http://www.1938media.com/comments-are-not-conversations/]]>Comment on Blogger Relationstag:blog.sourcinginnovation.com,2008-06-28:1155071Jan Husdalhttp://www.husdal.com2008-06-28T08:42:15Z2008-06-28T08:42:15ZComment on Workforce Management: A Servigistics Approachtag:blog.sourcinginnovation.com,2008-06-25:1147243the doctorhttp://blog.sourcinginnovation.com2008-06-25T08:36:08Z2008-06-25T08:36:08Z I'm not sure what to tell you. This is a blog about sourcing & procurement and related processes and technologies, not about avionics. Furthermore, I expect most of the F-22 program would be classified (especially I've seen first hand employees print off public information from the internet, collect it in a binder, and stamp classified on it), so I can't exactly point you at another blog. Maybe another reader will chime in with advice!]]>Comment on Workforce Management: A Servigistics Approachtag:blog.sourcinginnovation.com,2008-06-25:1147065Tom Host2008-06-25T07:09:48Z2008-06-25T07:09:48Z I've been away from the F-22 program for a while and I'd like to hear more about these latest technology developments]]>