The Need for Supplier Relationship Management Education

Capgemini recently announced some of the findings of its most recent research into supplier relationship management in a news release released last month. The findings demonstrated that a significant disconnect still exists in the state of the art of purchasing systems and the state of the practice. Although it found that businesses could expect to save 10-25% on their purchasing costs with an effective systems, it found that less than 50% of SRM users use the application to track orders and only 7% of purchasers use the reporting functions.

The study, which looked at priorities for global Chief Purchasing Officers (CPOs) from six different European countries in a wide cross-section of fields, also found that although many purchasers use spend information to prepare contracts, less than 40% can access the spend information in their SRM application and 30% said that they would need training to use the SRM application effectively.

Although neither the news release, nor the subsequent write-up on the European Leaders Network, discussed the issue, this indicates to me that business are still overlooking one of the key elements to success with any business system - user education.

Supplier Relationship Management, defined as creating an all-encompassing strategy where suppliers connect to your business in real-time, enabling you to gain control of your companies’ direct and indirect spend, transforming suppliers into business partners and extending applications to create value, can be greatly enhanced when well designed systems are used (providers include Apexon, SAP, and Vinimaya), but only if the users know how to use the system effectively. Make sure extensive training is included as part of your deployment plan and you may find that you are one of the top performing companies achieving a 20% plus return.

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • Trackbacks are closed for this post.
Comments

  • 10/4/2006 8:12 AM Jason Busch wrote:
    Dr. Mike,

    I think you nailed the more important points of the piece. By the way ... always amazes me the play in the media these studies get, given that they all sound so similiar. You'd think the trades and business media had never seen such a research study!

    More important, one other observation is that while the study does not adequately compare North American / European adoption, it's safe to assume that the continentals are lagging to some degree. The fact that only a minority use spend data in contract preparation is scary indeed. A good opportunity for vendors -- not to mention the consultants that keep pushing these research pieces out of the door!

    Yours for innovation,

    Jason
    1. 10/4/2006 10:23 AM Michael Lamoureux wrote:
      Jason:

      Good point.  Not every country is as up-to-date with supply chain best practices.  Although it's a little unrelated, I just read in Canadian Business that only 3% of companies in Canada that ship to the US are C-TPAT compliant - even though the last border scare caused backups 50 km long (over 35 miles if you're American) and increased average border crossing time from hours to days!  But Canada appears to be behind in supply chain in general ... despite the great opportunities afforded it as a result of being so close to its southern neighbor.

      Michael

Leave a comment

Comments are closed.